00:00
00:00
Calamaistr
Extensive freelance classical and retro videogame music composer, currently retired from the internet.

Age 41, Male

composing and things

when i was still a little cal

Netherlands

Joined on 8/11/09

Level:
16
Exp Points:
2,612 / 2,840
Exp Rank:
23,212
Vote Power:
5.78 votes
Rank:
Civilian
Global Rank:
> 100,000
Blams:
0
Saves:
3
B/P Bonus:
0%
Whistle:
Normal
Trophies:
3
Medals:
379

You are being moved like puppets on a string.

Posted by Calamaistr - April 16th, 2020

UPDATE 04-7-2020


He is the savior and hero, adored by all of man and their child.

Prevented the sickness destruction of all.

Vaccines had been lies, he gave us a real cure.. although it was small.

World ruler his name, now chanted the many.


The public went wild, as Lucifer came.

There had in truth not.. been sickness in any..

The cure instead did unknown to the lot

a sterile enviroment where no body could..

auton-omous-ly create its own ever..

Dependent now on; this savior so clever..

This is the plan that all of us got.


UPDATE 12-5-2020

Taking vacation, so to speak' from the internet (too much research past period is a bit tiring) So will no longer respond to questions. Sorry.

-Cal.


Oh hey, washington times too? YUP

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/28/coronavirus-hype-biggest-political-hoax-in-history/


LOOK AT THE INFLUENZA NUMBERS COMPARED TO THE FAUX COV

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/health_policy/Provisional-Death-Counts-COVID-19-Pneumonia-and-Influenza.pdf


https://qalerts.app/media/0cfbc41807f164864433d829c8543f28f92e6f45d6e430fcf7e91a13624c5b42.jpg


-


https://ia802609.us.archive.org/12/items/pdfy-tNG7MjZUicS-wiJb/Scenarios%20for%20the%20Future%20ofTechnology%20and%20International%20Development.pdf


Read page 17+

LOCK STEP.


This is a blueprinted program, not a pandemic.


There is no test for an isolated virus, the test looks for exosomes. (response to any and all upset of bacterial balance)

There is no symptom for any isolated virus, they diagnose on all influenza symptoms.

There is no movieesque thing as a airborne virus attacking people, virusses are solvents of the own body's biome. It is big-pharma buisiness model religious dogma that states virusses are organisms of their own, this is fraudulent and dangerous nonsense.

There is no overrun hospital anywhere on earth, the hospitals are all empty (documented)

There is no lack of beds due to overrun hospitals either, there was a bed shortage 3-4 years ago already.

There is no disaster out of the ordinary in Italy. Lombardy was known for its high density of high age elders with lung problems.

There is no disaster out of the ordinary in Wuhan. The area was the most polluted city on earth for many years and its population wore mouth protection for many years already aswell.

No mask protects against a viral infection due to viral infections being internal, not contageous' reactions after cell pollution by bacterial balance upset and/or polluted enviroment and foods.

No desinfectant soap will help against any viral infection because desinfectant soap kills your bodies own good bacteria and makes the external bacteria resistant 'causing' infection.

Staying inside lowers your vidD (a known imune system booster) intake.

Isolation and especially prevention of physical contact lowers your antioxidants and increases your oxidant levels in the body.

Zinc, magnesium, vitC, vitD, B complex, vitA, iodine (kelp).. these are all immune system boosting minerals and vitamins that you would normally gain from fresh foods, which means not the packaged conservated and sprayed with poison foods but either fresh from the land or frozen foods. Especially in the spring and summer months these foods are full of minerals and vitamins. In the winter they are poor with the above which causes deficiencies. Combined with less sunlight deficiencies of vitC and D especially are the direct cause of many influenzas and its family tree.


The above statements are all REAL medical knowledge, contrary to the pseudo scientist hacks you are bombarded with in the media. All of the above can be traced and confirmed by any real immunotherapist or physician.


Soon, very soon these facts will come to light worldwide. This is the awakening.

-Cal.


This is the reality:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/BV3R8pLzTjfi/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/hEJo0N8693RL/

Even industry taught doctors now whistleblow:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/sbBiAZsR7lfS/


For my American fellow human freedomlovers and constitutionalists;

https://www.aier.org/

Decent information, even though i dont agree with the pharmaceutical dogma on virusses thats still followed.

Protect your God given rights to the death.

Comments

Log in to Comment

S3C

will you be my puppet-master

Calamaistr

Please be your own.

S3C

Good to know that you encourage individualized thinking- I'm new to this, and it's just that there's a lot to unpack here, you know? Let's start with your first claim:

"There is no test for an isolated virus, the test looks for exosomes. (response to any and all upset of bacterial balance)"

Can you expound more on this testing procedure? Viral particles can be intracellular or exosomal. From the sample to genome sequencing or protein detection, there doesn't seem to be a process that would classify the organelle source, nor does it seem relevant.

Calamaistr

The fact that virusses originate' in a human biome/body also portray that the claim of covid (all id's) being airborne is false. If i pour coffee into a cup that contains the same brand coffee, i do not alter the substance either. If you get a cell with a cov into your body that already has endless cells containing cov you do not get 'infected'.

Then there is the claim (only adding to the fear, not the facts) that it would originate from a weapons lab. Everyone with any medical knowledge (that means you too) has at some level an understanding of what happens when you try to isolate a virus. (which has never, ever been succesfully done)

The cell is destroyed and with it the solvent that is the "virus".

It seems that there is a switcheroo going on where certain actors are portraying the traits of bacteria to virusses. A bacterial growth can actually be made into a weapon. A virus cannot.

As for exosomes themselves;

They do not show a cell, they do not show the structure of a virus, they literally show the exact same image as the image of an exosome when they illustrate what they proclaim as cov.
https://cen.acs.org/business/start-ups/Meet-exosome-rising-star-drug/96/i31

S3C

Thanks for the response!

There's a lot of interesting points you introduced that I'd like to circle back to, but I'm going to stay within the scope of exosomes/viruses for this comment.

'They do not show a cell'

Seems to go with out saying, as exosomes by definition are extracellular.

'They do not show the structure of a virus'

Why not? If the exosome is large enough to house a virus, why couldn't this be the case? The article you link states that it is possible.

Again, the organelle or structure source doesn't seem relevant to testing. An oral or blood sample seemingly would encapsulate the entire cellular community, from the continuous membrane cells, protein layers, and free floating extracellular material.

Calamaistr

When you look at what the mainstream medical world promotes as cov id19 they show the image of an exosome. This is not as to portray what it subjects to but what they look for in testing.
This means literally that they are testing for occurance of exosomes.

Beside that they often diagnose on symptoms (which are all cov and all influenza, all respiratory illnesses in fact. Not even on the above testing.

This is what i refer to and also conclude that it cannot be relevant to testing yet thats what they test on according to multiple sources such as . I also explained that a virus cannot be a weapon nor can it "infect" anyone. Wether anything could "house" a virus does not mean it "houses" a specific virus nor does it mean it "houses" a virus by default. And yet the occurance of exosomes is enough for the testing procedure to diagnose with cov id19. (not that many people actually are being tested, which i believe is kept for a moment in time wherein most people are afraid enough to go along with measures they inflict upon themselves not to "infect" others the moment they consider themselves 'infected' ..which everyone is as everyone has exosomes, all the time.. from many causes.

Thank you for your interesting posting thusfar, im not entirely familiar with certain lingo but i learn quick. I come from the side of immunology and nutricianist sciences.. so its all still quick to understand. :)

This is a quite interesting video about the subject which puts it a bit better together than i can with my field of expertise.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roDGPZMev7s

But its all intertwined. I research this subject for about 15 years now.
-Cal

Calamaistr

When you look at what the mainstream medical world promotes as cov id19 they show the image of an exosome. This is not as to portray what it subjects to but what they look for in testing.
This means literally that they are testing for occurance of exosomes.

Beside that they often diagnose on symptoms (which are all cov and all influenza, all respiratory illnesses in fact. Not even on the above testing.

This is what i refer to and also conclude that it cannot be relevant to testing yet thats what they test on according to multiple sources such as andrew kaufman. I also explained that a virus cannot be a weapon nor can it "infect" anyone. Wether anything could "house" a virus does not mean it "houses" a specific virus nor does it mean it "houses" a virus by default. And yet the occurance of exosomes is enough for the testing procedure to diagnose with cov id19. (not that many people actually are being tested, which i believe is kept for a moment in time wherein most people are afraid enough to go along with measures they inflict upon themselves not to "infect" others the moment they consider themselves 'infected' ..which everyone is as everyone has exosomes, all the time.. from many causes.

Thank you for your interesting posting thusfar, im not entirely familiar with certain lingo but i learn quick. I come from the side of immunology and nutricianist sciences.. so its all still quick to understand. :)

This is a quite interesting video about the subject which puts it a bit better together than i can with my field of expertise.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roDGPZMev7s

But its all intertwined. I research this subject for about 15 years now.
-Cal

S3C

They just show the image of an exosome? That seems rather vague, can you expound on this a bit?

Do you mean they just test for the presence of any *exosomes* despite the body being an amalgamation of the aforementioned continuous cellular and extracellular material?

" Wether anything could "house" a virus does not mean it "houses" a specific virus nor does it mean it "houses" a virus by default"

Agreed, but can't electron microscopy be used to show viruses? Could the virus be a different looking exosome that doesn't appear in healthy tissue and generally disappears once the symptoms go away?

But is imaging even a diagnostic technique? A COVID-19 genome has been sequenced. I believe the standard procedure for any microbial infection is to take a sample, and use certain techniques to see if the pathogenic strain is there (or produces antigens native to the pathogen). If so, the exosome argument seems to me, irrelevant.

thanks for the video, will try to respond to Dr. Kaufman's points later

Calamaistr

Electron (diamond) microscopy can indeed be used to look into a cell but this kind of equipment is expensive and rare and simply is not in the protocol. It is as i explained.. they do not look for extracellular material, they look for exosomes. That is the protocol. Ridiculous as it sounds, they have not isolated any cov. It is a travesty of warped medical sciences. They are not doctors, Gates isnt a doctor and fauci is a merchant and big pharma agent. There are many actual top doctors rebelling against these frauds. Take Dr. Rashid Buttar, Dr. Shiva ayyadurai and Cameron kyle sidell. (explained how the symptoms are not of a influenza process but like altitude sickness which comes from 60 gigaherz according to even modern sources and is furthen proven by following statements; https://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/sub10-systems-oxygen-absorption-makes-60-ghz-perfect-for-backhaul Do not be mislead by the subject, the content states that the property of oxygen molecules change.. that is actually a huge deal. Many reports and testing of 60ghz range on humans do not state this but speak only of skin/antenna heating.. Which can cause up to a whole degree of temperature change which is also a symptom of influenzas.

I would ask you to respond to the points made by Rashid Buttan rather.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Aj5UEEX0M2xU/

I sincerely hope that video isnt removed by the time you read this. Others have been and the cencorship on mainstream social media is astounding right now. If you even state the latest ''internetspeed'' in word its a trip to post-dissapeared land.

S3C

There are upper echelon models priced in the millions; but otherwise I believe there are electron microscopes (with sufficient magnification/resolution to see viruses) to be had for much cheaper. Many research universities have them, and they can be purchased for the price of 2X a MRI. But this isn't a practical diagnostic technique (genetic testing is), and would be akin to using a shotgun to kill a fly. Besides, isn't imaging is needed to detect the presence of organelles and exosomes? Wouldn't this contradict the protocol?

Seems like this conversation is treading into 5G/NWO territory- relevant and important, but not a road I want to go down just yet at the current scope of this conversation. Yes, the censorship on popular social media platforms is tragic but not without a silver lining, it's making more people question, and providing exposure for the views which this medium try to quell. For Christ Sake, look at the comments on Bill and Melinda Gates Instagram accounts! The link still works, I'm watching it rn. The opening statement though- "This information hasn't been evaluated by the FDA. Please consult your physician before starting any medical regimen" Why should I? Isn't the FDA and establishment what they are trying to fight against?

Calamaistr

To start with your closing question, such a statement for the legality.

I cant help but touch the territory you mention because it is subject to it, documented.
David rockefeller literally stated from his own mouth; "Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure--one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” (and all the players of this 'crisis' come from its foundation) It is not (and i do not believe you avoid the subject for anything but to focus on what they talk about for now) a conspiracy theory but a conspiracy fact.

The reason i touch it is clear, it is the basis of the 'crisis'. It is the goal of the crisis.
It is simply the entire body of it sailing on a sea of animal magnetism (mesmer) and pavlovian technique. Conditioning through fear. The method of all communist system.

The entire narration can easily be debunked and all parts of it are. Though we hyperfocus on a detail here which is the method of diagnosis, it fits into the larger picture of number-magic. rediagnosing existing conditions, controlling the statistics. Even the diagnosis itself is in mainstream media warped at this point where newspapers claim that the symptoms for alledged "cov" is the same as hayfever. Knowing full well that their own narrative not too long ago was of the fear monger worst case of people literally dropping where they stood and honeycomb holes burning through lung tissue. Such should make anyone, everyone question the validity.

There is no logic in measures either, no face mask can ever protect against anything other than dust particles, no sanitizing soap does any good unless you work with dangerous bacteria and rarely so as it is alot more fatal for your own good bacteria than it is for the bad.
No surface can ever hold a virus other than the internal biome of a lifeform and no immune system can be penetrated unless severely undermined. (which for instance aids does)
It is utterly ridiculous how people are isolated which has been scientifically proven to reduce the immune systems function because it causes oxidation. It is ridiculous how people are kept sterile. None of the measures, none of the diagnosing makes any logical sense and that is a red flag.

What is being done is a new level of obediance and a new level of divide and conquer.
And worst of all is that many of the vital layers of society are erased which makes the entire people of states and countries utterly dependant on a socialist, marxist even.. system.

This all under the spell of necessity..

And necessity knows no law.

S3C

It's an infinitely deep discussion, and while I appreciate your passion (and will try to get to the rest of your message in its entirety), for a newbie like me the most effective way to absorb is from the bottom on up. I'm already a bit inundated with the high level explanations and narratives.

So to restate my two questions pertinent to testing:

1. How is the presence of exosomes determined without use of an imaging technique?
2. What is incorrect about the genetic testing and sequencing procedures?

Or should I just take your word for it now, and move on to formulating questions about a different point?

Cheers!

Calamaistr

1: I can only go by the words of whistleblower top doctors on this particular matter and dont think myself that they go as far as to determine without imaging techniques, either they have the means to go as far as the cell/exosome level and are told to do as, or the entire process is sourced by a total fraud segment in the hierarchy of organization. This 'i reason by logical thinking.

2: incorrect is there not being a model for testing other than a test (and ive had to look for the name of it but cant find it anymore.. sigh sorry about this) that was stated by its creator to not be used for any viral conditions because its not reliable. Second is that all illness are ignored in a deathprocess and instead cov id19 is administered in the cause of death. Notice how in the numbers known influenzas, pneumonias and even heart attacks have dropped to record lows. Its easy to control testing scores this way and create an artificial pandemic. As for an even more obvious incorrect showcase is that the tests have four results; positive (based on occurance of exosomes, not an actual recogniceable virus in it) negative (none of the prior), false positive (second test is negative) or even false negative (second test is positive).
Added even more stupendous is that they test on symptoms in hospitals, not even swab.
If you have a runny nose and a cough, you are added to as having cov id19 and forced a 14 day self quarantine. If you test negative by swab (for exosomes, go figure.. i cant help but remention this) you are tested again untill you test positive (or false positive for what they care)

You see, wether you actually are ill or not (they then state people can have "it" without symptoms... which is medically impossible.. but were way past that) they will make sure you are added to the numbers at atleast some point, villainized to your community and alienated at the very least.

I hope this answers your questions.
-Cal

S3C

Thanks for the honest response, I will respond to you more at length this time in systematic fashion, further covering some of the other points you have addressed.

Regarding 1, I was referring to hospital based testing. Most do not have electron microscopes, and as mentioned, it is not a practical method. Moreover, if they are testing based on symptoms opposed to sampling, as you suggest, then this vacuously affirms they do not test for exosomes. (And even if they did, all tests would be positive, as exosomes are a ubiquitous component of the cellular system, right?) So some of the information your are presenting to me here feels contradictory, and while doesn't entail that proper procedures are conducted overall, doesn't provide any evidence to the claim that "the test looks for exosomes".

To give an anecdote: I live right next to a hospital. I asked the front desk what the procedures are, they say it's by throat swab. They publish their numbers on their website. Most tests come back negative. Due to limited testing (it's a small hospital in a predominantly elderly community), they do not, unless you are 65+, have pre-existing conditions, have trouble breathing, or symptoms have not improved for a week. Now if the lab technicians are being dishonest and fabricating the numbers in cooperation with other hospitals statewide, I don't know.

"there not being a model for testing other than a test (and ive had to look for the name of it but cant find it anymore.. sigh sorry about this) that was stated by its creator to not be used for any viral conditions because its not reliable. "

hmm...PCR? I cannot find any objections using this technique to test for viruses. Why did the creator feel it was unreliable? And when did he say this? Since PCR has been further developed over the past few decades.

" Second is that all illness are ignored in a deathprocess and instead cov id19 is administered in the cause of death."

The numbers show that COVID-19 was discovered among those dead, but the raw statistics can not inherently imply that COVID-19 is (not) the cause (although that is how many are interpreting it) nor does is it based on other illnesses/status that the afflicted may have, including being elderly. But it's a bit of a semantics game. If you have a heart disease in which you are likely to get a heart attack, is it the disease or attack that is the cause of death? It's well known if not generally agreed that the elderly and those with combordities are more at risk, and logically it's reasonable to surmise that COVID-19 may be an aggravating factor, especially to those with respiratory illnesses.

" Notice how in the numbers known influenzas, pneumonias and even heart attacks have dropped to record lows"

Have they? Where have you heard this? I'm sure the data is out there, but I can't find any statistics that affirm this or a counterclaim. Pneumonia is often caused by respiratory viruses like influenza and COVID, so I'm bit skeptical of that.

"As for an even more obvious incorrect showcase is that the tests have four results"

How is it incorrect? What results should there be? The test is a binary classification, it's either false or positive (which is true or false).

"they then state people can have "it" without symptoms... which is medically impossible"

How so? Not everybody that tests positive for a micro-organism or genetic condition will exhibit the phenotypic conditions: IOW be asymptomatic

Calamaistr

I never said they are testing on symptoms 'opposed' to samples, i clearly said they are testing on symptoms if not testing by swab (samples). Most test by symptoms unless they take a swab, when they do they test on rna and not on identified virusses.
You hit the hammer on the head when you said all tests would be positive, all tests ARE positive as in reality they declare all negatives a false negative. People are being tested untill they show positive for the rna. Not contradictory at all.

About the subject of the creator of a test stating not to use it for what its used for i wish i remembered the name, its talked about in many whistleblower recordings though but i wont ask you to sift through them for it. I might come across it again at some point and ill get back to you on it then.

It isnt policy to begin with to declare a influenza as the cause of death when someone suffers from a failing heart, end stage parkinsons or old age complications, however now it is in this upside down world.

The data for the record lows is everywhere on official institute sites.

Im talking about government bodies declaring that people can have "it" without any symptoms whatsoever. Most flu is asymptomatic. Were according to government version of this cov not speaking of something as a flu but something clinical. People dropping in the streets, honeycomb holes in their lungs? That is not something that can be asymptomatic. That is clinical.

Context is everything friend.
-Cal.

Calamaistr

@S3C Ok i finally found the reference; Kochs postulates. Sorry i took so long.

S3C

No worries about taking long I've been MIA for a few days anyhow.

I don't intend to dwell on the exosomes/hospital issue much longer, but you didn't fully address my retort. My fault as it was a bit long-winded. Let me clarify a few things

"Not contradictory at all."

you directly said they test for exosomes (now you are saying RNA) which caught my attention. But the vast majority of testing facilities do not even have the requisite technology to test for exosomes. This is the claim that is contradictory.

"Most test by symptoms unless they take a swab, when they do they test on rna and not on identified virusses."

Maybe I'm misunderstanding you here. When you say 'test', do you mean test to officially confirm a case of COVID-19, or just using symptoms as a basis for self-isolation recommendations? no official testing would occur for the latter; positive cases aren't confirmed via a correlation to causation premise.

As far as I'm concerned, ALL official test numbers (in America at least) come from samples (i.e. via swab) NOT by symptom alone. Symptoms (along with age and other comorbidities, like mentioned) is a criterion for getting tested.

"You hit the hammer on the head when you said all tests would be positive, all tests ARE positive as in reality they declare all negatives a false negative"

I'm bushed on how to address this. What I said was purely theoretical in relation to exosome testing any why it would be pointless in principle, let alone for practicality; not the reported statistics on actual clinical tests.

More tests are negative than positive. Don't take my word for it though, I can't re-locate the source from which I obtained this aggregate statistic, but some states/hospitals websites publish their positive/negative ratios which support this.

"It isnt policy to begin with to declare a influenza as the cause of death when someone suffers from a failing heart, end stage parkinsons or old age complications, however now it is in this upside down world."

fair, nonetheless the numbers in of them itself are unbiased, the interpretations, implications, and associated factors (comorbidities) lies with the reader, while some may use the numbers to push agendas or turn the world upside down.

"The data for the record lows is everywhere on official institute sites."

Honestly, my Google-Fu has not been able to dig up any figures or current reports, so if you can share some of these official institute pages that would be appreciated. Either way I'll take your word for it, in which case additional skepticism is duly noted.

"Most flu is asymptomatic."

So you can be the carrier of a pathogen without showing symptoms then. Seems like we are in agreement? Sorry, I'm having difficulty seeing the context to frame your last paragraph.

BTW- influeza (flu) and coronavirus (COVID-19) are different viruses/illnesses. You probably know that, stating just in case.

Thanks for digging up the postulates but what are they in reference to? Koch died before the age of DNA and genetics lol, so I suppose your inclusion is for PCR creator's rebuke of applying PCR technique towards viruses? From reading up on the postulates, it seems they are to be used with a grain of salt in the modern age, even Koch himself that the postulates are not universal indicators of disease. I can elaborate if desired, or where the postulates mentioned for some other reason?

Calamaistr

I understand that the way i put things can be confusing because i (in terms of investigation) am way past the curve and its sadly in my personality to forget that i sometimes have more information than someone else and leave it out even though it is crucial for the context. This is why i also fail to explain it clearly. For this reason i have added a few videos to my original post, especially the bottom one of california doctors is relevant and i hope it answers some of your questions.

As for the BTW, yes flu and the ACTUAL 'novel lung disease' that is misdiagnosed as flu symptomized cov are different. The novel lung disease has been compared to altitude sickness and is the result of deprivation of oxygen absorption by hemoglobine.
This is what causes people to drop where they stand and honeycomb holes in the lungs.
A flu symptomized condition is simply the darn flu that is different every single year because people are different every single year and the flu is not a little creature flying around from people to people by their split or sneeze but a bodies own. Bodies have virusses, bodies have bacteria (and even most bacteria declared as bad bacteria are actually good for us)
You cannot get infected by flu, you are under the same conditions as your "group".
Its a misconception that any virus is contagious and the fact that people dont actually do research into every single so called pandemic they never find out that ALL of them were enviromental pollution caused. Good thing there is enough information, all it takes are people who are willing to educate themselves, instead of being told.

S3C

thanks for posting the links, sadly no it doesn't answer my questions, but to be honest I just skimmed through them. Intelligent, well-respected individuals have always had differences of opinion. I was addressing you directly, and interested in what you have to say over them, so I was hoping that you would be able to improve my shallow understanding of this topic (as I am behind the curve), and I can reference back to your sources as necessary.

Calamaistr

Im trying to stay respectful, but im not sure if youre trolling because the doctors that ive linked to redirect to many a source that explain and prove that the testing is on either symptoms or when a swab on exosomes. The data is there. If i come across anything specific ill add it to this newspost.. but untill then youll have to get it from the given links.

S3C

um, excuse me? When someone cites something, they cite the page number, not the encyclopedia. I have watched some of your videos, and didn't hear anything substantial about exosomes. I don't have the energy (or time) to wade through multiple hour long videos to get those specific answers. If you don't know the specifics, just say so instead of expect others to sift for a needle in a haystack...

Calamaistr

You dont have the time in an era where everyone is out of work? For one i know Andrew kaufman refers extensively about it so research into him, hes a highly educated decorated medical expert.

S3C

I'm fortunate to still have my job. They are starting to bring people on site as a matter of fact, and my recent delayed responses were in lieu of trying to catch up.

Yes, I've watched the Dr. Kaufman video (that was the first one you linked me to I believe), he claimed that the virus was an exosome, but I don't remember him saying that the COVID-19 test "looks for exosomes". Anyway, I'm here to learn, and posting here because I value your 'alternative' opinion, and want to make clear that my questions aren't a veiled attempt to falsify anything. But like I said, intelligent people have varying opinions: https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/47287/do-studies-show-that-viruses-are-contagious

anyway, have you seen this: https://nerdhaspower.weebly.com/ratg13-is-fake.html

Calamaistr

Alright fair, everyone may believe what they want. Problem here is that in this era concensus medical position is a religion that does not allow anyone to believe what they want, instead everyone is under tyrannical arrest in belief of one version, even when many experts disagree and very well substantiate their findings.. no.. they are instantly censored. If that does not strike you atleast somewhat suspicious...

Im not one for logical fallacy where i jump to conclusions just because some powers may abuse a crisis not to go to waste. But there really is more to it.
Like i said i will share all specifics when i come across them but youll have to forgive my slow speed since i myself live off the grid and only respond (right now daily, i know) textually, not able to use or create a library of shareable content.. through the pc and internet of a family member that lives in another part of the city. I generally use their pc to get research material for myself that i bring with me on usb. So i cannot access everything i talk about when i need it.

Uptill now not a single virus has ever been isolated because virusses evaporate before our very eyes the moment they are attempted to. I know there is a claim that the hi-virus was isolated but this has never been proven. As far as i know viral occurance is still a response to bacterial infection from bad enviroment, diet or in some cases simply heretidary causes. Virusses are not an agent of disease nor do they cause it. And to fight virusses is to fight life itself because we are made from them with our immune system, we cannot live bubble wrapped. We need to build autonomous immunity. Not externally. Internally.
Virusses are much smaller than cells, so small it took ages for them to even be discovered and yet there are still claims that virusses can survive outside their originating host. The world is in truth a very hazardous place. Full of deadly, and deadlier bacteria that we as embodiments bastion against with our own bacterial culture. No virus is alive to begin with and no virus would be able to stay "safe" in any bacterial enviroment. Not even a second.

The test is for rna. This is admitted throughout all testing facilities because there is no virus isolated nor recogniced. If you ask me personally (and ill keep it as my personal opinion) they are diagnosing the flu (which is a cyclical detox of a host procced when the lifeforms mineral and vitamin levels are at a lowpoint during winter and not an illness nor contagious either)
and the entire cov is political arm-flinging showcasing the players true intent and true power hunger manifest. In a way a good thing if youre looking to unmask those with tyrannical ideas.
Bad for those who are poor in self government and emediately throw all concience and logic out to follow orders.. and cave to the pressure.. in the end its a choice which side youre on. And perhaps a test.

I believe its a crossroad, perhaps biblically so.

Again, if i find the specifics ill add them here.
And sorry but im not interested in speculation (your links) right now, typing all this halved my worktime already. Have alot of research material already.

-Cal

S3C

I don't find it somewhat suspicious. I find it highly suspicious. I 100% agree with your first paragraph. Censorship leads to suspicion and suspicion leads to division. It's especially unwarranted when the presenters have put in the legwork, present critical questions while being civil and keeping the fearmongering too a minimum. Yes, it can be scary, but if medical leaders are so confident about their science, and findings, and are health professionals over corporate revenue generators, they should *want* to be presented with opposing evidence and ideas for them to dispel.

That's cool, the links are only their for your reading leisure. It popped up while researching Dr. Kaufman. I thought that you as well, might be interested in reading opposing information to strengthen your own viewpoints. Not sure if by calling it 'speculation' your demeaning the links I post as lesser than your own- if you're unfamiliar with StackExchange, it's a premier, academic community where individuals (including seasoned professionals) provide substantial, well-sourced discussion. Post something less than well-founded, get trolled by a bunch of neurotic pedants- a process almost as rigorous as peer-review :P

And the last link is tangentially related to our discussion thus far- it has compelling genetic analysis that some of the genomic conclusions data was purposely falsified (in a way coinciding with some of your claims in the OP), and that the virus was not only created in a lab, but a manufactured bioweapon.

now back to the biology, per what I've researched:

"Uptill now not a single virus has ever been isolated because virusses evaporate before our very eyes the moment they are attempted to."

I don't feel this point is salient. Right, viruses don't just exist isolated on their own, they feed off surrounding cellular culture. Cells can last on a surface for extended periods of time and by extension, the viruses in them.

"As far as i know viral occurance is still a response to bacterial infection from bad enviroment, diet or in some cases simply heretidary causes. Virusses are not an agent of disease nor do they cause it. "

Viruses can invade and kill cells. For example, HIV invades T-cells and induces cellular apoptosis (suicide). While HIV is transmitted sexually and doesn't need require the causes you suggests to be effective, suppose for the sake of explanation the virus was caused by a bacterial infection, and suppose that said bacterial infection occurred due to cancer. And at the top level, this cancer was caused by a bad diet. From diet to the virus, IMO these are all agents of a disease that kills T-cells, and if the virus isn't present, there is no disease.

"And to fight virusses is to fight life itself because we are made from them with our immune system, we cannot live bubble wrapped. We need to build autonomous immunity. Not externally. Internally."

You're not wrong. We all need a healthy microbiome. Especially younger individuals need the exposure to germs for building their immune system, like you said. Those who ate their boogers when they were young are likely to survive COVID-19 or whatever pathogenic disease. Moreover, viral and bacterial therapy is a thing. One example of the former is introducing viruses to harmful bacterial hosts, to which they invade bacterial cells and cause them to burst due to over-proliferation of viral copies, effectively killing the bacteria and the virus along with it.

But not all viruses are beneficial. Not all bacteria is beneficial. And not all cells are good.
Treatment/prevention is a targeted and complex scenario often to the detriment of the microbiome. There are weighted risks. Sometimes the risk might be "there's a 10% chance fighting the harmful virus might kill me; best deplete my microbiome (which can be rebuilt later) vs a 50% chance that not fighting the harmful virus will kill me". No implications intended here towards the current situation.

"Virusses are much smaller than cells, so small it took ages for them to even be discovered and yet there are still claims that virusses can survive outside their originating host"

I don't see how size is relevant. As mentioned above, the virus is passed along with the encompassing cells that it has invaded. The host here can be as generic as cells types across species. The DNA that host produces itself doesn't seem to be universally relevant towards to viral survial. Thus, this would allow for viruses to be food or animal-borne.

"No virus is alive to begin"

From reading I see that viruses are considered to be on "the edge of life". What constitutes life has a fuzzy boundary, but this assertion is acceptable to me given that viruses need to hijack cellular machinery to be active.

The virus just needs the host to be alive. It doesn't "try" to stay alive or reach equilibrium like all other lifeforms, either. But this is more of a semantic issue and has no indiciation on its pathogenicity. I rather like this quote from The Matrix, Mr. Smith:

S3C

"I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species and I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment but you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply and multiply until every natural resource is consumed and the only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You're a plague and we are the cure."

"The test is for rna. This is admitted throughout all testing facilities because there is no virus isolated nor recogniced."

The test is for RNA and that is a standard procedure, they test for RNA that matches proteins (correct me if I'm wrong) of the sequenced COVID-19 genome, corroborated from health departments and universities around the world.

For your future reference, more information on testing procedures, results from testing kits of various companies (see the IFU documents) and accreditation, see:

https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/emergency-situations-medical-devices/emergency-use-authorizations#covid19ivd

The documents also confer results/procedures for testing and their sensitivity/specificity against other common viruses, including some influenza strains.

I've intentionally refrained on the poltical nature of this- I'm not smart nor brave enough. It's primarily built on speculation and furthermore not (or to a lesser degree) repeatable and verifiable like science. That said, my inclination to agree with your sentiments their is increasing daily.

RE: off the grid

I know. I actually read your previous blogs the last time I was on your page. Most admirable, and something I dream about doing myself in the future. Unfortunate in some ways I've become a slave to the corporate world and want to honor my contractual obligations and that requires heavy usage of computers and relevant technology. Not making any more digital music though...I think that would be difficult, and I'd certainly miss programming. I have a lack of the requisite survivalist skills but I would humbly learn to behave as nature intended.

Calamaistr

I do want to thank you for all youve said, and im glad that you agree with my stance on things. We do not seem to think much differently. I do have a hunch you have been schooled through pharmaceutical positions considering your knowledge of the material but still the stance of that virusses are causing illness. This is a buisinessmodel for the pharmaceutical industry, and most people that aspire to become doctors become dependant on that model and narrative for their own career. Afterall.. medicine (or presumed medicine) is a billion dollar industry. Same thing with telecom industries that have way too high stakes in the internet of things to allow dissent or proof that their product is harmful. (even though this is proven scientifically countlessly over every spectrum of frequency utilization, and this subject is my field of expertise .. sound sciences.)

Ill need to keep this short. Ive added a comment to my main post. Still wanted to respond to you for all your efforts to keep this conversation live and therefor this reply. But ill have to keep my internet-usage ..very very low now. I was sliding back into overspending usage for research access. Its not the lifestyle i want. But ...i suppose for a little while it was necessary. And necessity is the mother of all invention.

Keep increasing your sentiments for good. We are many, we are the majority that are educating ourselves and awakening from a life of dependency and mesmer.

With respect, here a digital handshake.
-Cal.

S3C

Cheers, Cal. Thanks for the kind sentiments and keeping it civil despite some potential disagreements. All the best to your life outside this digital fantasy.

Tyler

based

Main Sections

Extra, Extra!

Community

NG Related

©Copyright 1995-2024 Newgrounds, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use